Relationship Punch
Say the difficult thing kindly

Family & Parenting

Illness in a relationship

Long-term health problems change a partnership in specific ways, and the changes are easier to handle when they are named.

A counselor facilitating a group therapy session in a modern indoor setting.
A counselor facilitating a group therapy session in a modern indoor setting. · Photo via Pexels
Health information notice. General information — not a substitute for professional advice. Read the full disclaimer.

A serious or chronic illness reshapes a relationship. The literature on this is reasonably substantial, and the difficulties it identifies are consistent enough to prepare for.

What changes

The division of labour, permanently. Tasks transfer and generally do not transfer back.

The role structure. Where one partner becomes a carer, the relationship acquires a second structure alongside the first, and the two do not sit easily together.

Research on this consistently identifies role conflict as a central difficulty — the same person managing medication and being a spouse, with the two roles requiring different things.

The identity of the ill person. Loss of function, of work, of independence and of the ability to reciprocate are all commonly reported as harder than the symptoms.

The distribution of attention. Everything organises around the illness, and the well partner's needs become illegitimate to raise.

The future. Plans are revised or abandoned, frequently without an explicit conversation, and the loss goes unacknowledged.

What appears to help

Separating the roles explicitly. Some couples designate times or activities where the illness is not the subject and no care is provided.

This sounds artificial and is consistently reported as valuable, because without it the relationship becomes entirely clinical.

Outside care where possible. Bringing in help for the most role-distorting tasks — personal care in particular — preserves the partnership more than the same hours of help elsewhere.

Preserving what the ill partner can still do. The instinct to take over everything is protective and it accelerates the loss of role.

Retaining responsibility for something, even something small, is repeatedly identified as important.

Naming the losses. Both people are grieving something — capability on one side, the expected future on both — and the well partner frequently feels they have no standing to.

They do, and the unexpressed version tends to emerge as irritability.

Accurate information. Both partners understanding the condition, the prognosis and the treatment reduces a category of anxiety that is otherwise continuous.

The well partner

Whose position is under-discussed.

Research on partners of people with chronic illness finds elevated rates of depression, anxiety and physical health problems, sometimes comparable to those of the patient.

Support is generally directed at the ill person, and the partner is treated as a resource rather than as someone affected.

What is worth insisting on: their own medical care, their own support outside the relationship, some time that is not about the illness, and respite.

These are frequently declined out of guilt, and their absence is what causes arrangements to break down.

The ill partner

Where a specific difficulty arises.

Dependence on someone you also want to be an equal to is genuinely hard, and it frequently produces irritability directed at the person providing the care.

This is common, it is not ingratitude, and naming it directly helps both people considerably.

Also worth preserving: the ability to be asked for things. A relationship in which one person only receives becomes unbalanced in a way that is corrosive to the person receiving.

Intimacy

Which is affected by most serious conditions and by many treatments, and which is discussed with clinicians much less often than it should be.

Fatigue, pain, medication effects, body image and the role shift all contribute.

Worth raising with a clinician, because a proportion of it is treatable and much of it is assumed to be unavoidable when it is not.

Worth raising with each other, because the alternative is two people each assuming the other has lost interest.

The practical layer

Not romantic and it reduces a large amount of stress.

Understanding the financial position, the entitlements available, the insurance situation and the legal arrangements — power of attorney in particular — while both people can participate in the decisions.

These conversations are avoided for understandable reasons and their absence produces decisions made in crisis by someone exhausted.

General information only, not medical, legal or financial advice. Consult qualified professionals about your own circumstances.

Imogen Hart
Editor, Relationship Punch

Imogen is a couples therapist of fifteen years. She writes the things she finds herself saying in session for the hundredth time.

More from Imogen →

Also by Imogen Hart

Family & Parenting

Friendship after children

Social networks contract sharply after a first child, and the loss has consequences for the couple that are rarely connected to it.

Daniel Osei··3 min read

Family & Parenting

Two careers and one household

Whose job takes precedence is decided by default in most couples, and the default has consequences that compound.

Martina Vogel··3 min read

Attachment

Independence inside a couple

Merging is presented as the goal and produces a specific set of problems that appear around the third year.

Martina Vogel··3 min read

Endings & Repair

Starting again, with what you know now

A short account of what the evidence across this whole subject actually supports, for anyone beginning again.

Martina Vogel··3 min read

Endings & Repair

What people say they learned

Accounts from people looking back on relationships that ended converge on a small number of observations.

Daniel Osei··3 min read